Re: Blood & Fire
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:20 pm
tings nuh de same wid nuh B&F stuff
BLESS
BLESS
Roots Reggae discussions & more
https://www.roots-archives.com/forum/
You are right, but I hope that's not only business terms matter in this world...If they paid original artists and it was the main reason why they are out, then even greater respect for them...bonga wrote:...and the novel idea of paying the artists and producers...
Well, maybe a nice and very friendly gesture, but not really smart in terms of business (imo this is financial suicide )
Dub out of Poland wrote:I really miss B&F, they did a great job, numerous fantastic albums brought back to daylight!!!
adilisha wrote:Blood & Fire was my favourite label and I learnt much through their releases.
Zionist wrote: ...Blood & Fire exposed me to a tremendous amount of great music... It's just not good for the music for a high quality label like that to fold.
Blood and Fire had a huge effect on my tastes, starting with a 2nd hand copy of 'Dub Gone Crazy' picked up in Glasgow, quickly followed by copies of 'Jesus Dread' and 'Social Living' bought from my local record shop. I was astonished when I first picked up some Jamaican vinyl - it sounded crackly, it had a shoddy cover, there was no sleevenotes. Surely I had a bad copy!? I assumed ALL reggae would be as lavishly packaged and sound as good as Blood and Fire stuff. Know better now tho'!Jah Titus wrote:tings nuh de same wid nuh B&F stuff
Zionist wrote:As a person who has deliberately avoided the vinyl bug, Blood & Fire exposed me to a tremendous amount of great music. I'm probably preaching to the choir but they really set the standard for high quality reissues with generally good sound quality, fine artwork, great liner notes and even the odd royalty to the artist (who ever heard of such a thing?!) Props to Barrow.
Yeah, my hats off to Steve Barrow for this as well - rather than rushing them out in shoddy packaging with no licensing deals and no mastering, he went to a great deal of effort to make sure that what he thought was great music with enduring appeal was treated accordingly - and he made it available and accessible to both hardcore reggae fans and to curious beginners.ACEtone wrote:Disregarding all of the arguments, opinions, misconceptions etc. about vinyl versus Cd versus digital file, I really believe that B&F proved that remastering could be done properly. I have always suspected that the cost of such perfectionism must have really cut into their profit margin on almost every release as did the sumptuous packaging and the novel idea of paying the artists and producers.
ACEtone wrote:How do you make a hit if you are reissuing? Marketing? To some degree yes, but it's a gamble and the stakes are higher without the financial backing of corp. and indeed the unlikelihood of a touring band to promote the reissue release. Let's say they reissue something not that many people want for whatever reason. What do they do besides lose a heap of money? All a labour of love really.
This is the bit that worries me - these are all small, specialised operations, and if the biggest can fall, it must be a precarious business. I imagine there are records the labels themselves would love to repress that they can't take the risk on.Dub out of Poland wrote:The problem is that such labels are usually led by reggae lovers, not businessmen. It's a passion, not a business. At least, not only...
informer wrote:the problem is that the youth of today prefers mp3 low fi shit and the days of vinyl and cd come to an end i fear. so it becomes more and more difficult for a small label to survive in a ever shrinking market.
ACEtone wrote:I will download stuff for free when it is the easiest way to get it, but if BF or Pressure Sounds have something that I think sounds interesting - or I've wanted for a time - I'll spend the $$$.
I have posted my thoughts on this here:bonga wrote:If the market is shrinking, or changing you need to adapt.
hey Stubie, mi nuh tink later B&F stuff as being irrelevant - wat do yu seh bout Prince Far I´s "Silver & Gold" or Yabby You´s "Deliver Me From My Enemies"? Blessed an Crucial stuff, yunnoStubie wrote:The early Blood & Fire releases were vital and then the later stuff got to a point of being irrelevant. but without Blood & Fire we wouldnt have all of the smaller labels. Nuff said!!!
Agreed. But it may not be their fault. People are being brainwashed, somewhat, into believing that an iPod loaded with mp3s is some some of 'state of the art' sound reproduction kit.informer wrote:the problem is that the youth of today prefers mp3 low fi shit and the days of vinyl and cd come to an end i fear. so it becomes more and more difficult for a small label to survive in a ever shrinking market.
While that is true don't you think it's more down to the current climate? BAF released dozens of albums! If they couldn't handle the business end they would have folded after issuing just a handful.Dub out of Poland wrote:The problem is that such labels are usually led by reggae lovers, not businessmen. It's a passion, not a business. At least, not only...
Blood & Fire was near enough as small as it gets - only three staff.Stubie wrote:... without Blood & Fire we wouldnt have all of the smaller labels. Nuff said!!!
If 'adapting' no longer means selling sufficient quantities of CD's or LP's where can you take it other than mp3 downloads?bonga wrote:I think these people have a bad/uncoordinated business model, combined with a not very smart financial strategy...
If the market is shrinking, or changing you need to adapt. It's the same in the animal world, Animal species who can't adapt themselfs to new environments won't survive....