Page 4 of 4

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:09 pm
by ton1
ras_gaks wrote:sorry i chocked..

to me, reggae is reggae.
whether digital or ehh... is the other one called analogue?

note: I said 'to me'


UNITY.
to me roots is roots and digital is digital, roots is not digital and digital is not roots :)

note : I also said 'to me'
note 2 : I did not say digital is crap

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:15 pm
by Jah Titus
hey, wat´s bout Digi-Roots? ;)


BLESS

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:29 pm
by ton1
Jah Titus wrote:hey, wat´s bout Digi-Roots?

BLESS
digi-roots is a very small part of digital, I know the line is thin and it's not black or white :).

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:32 pm
by Guest
digi roots like firehouse? it should be added its not too much.

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:40 pm
by Guest

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:54 pm
by seb
check this thread for more info about what I think about it :

http://www.roots-archives.com/forum/read.php?2,52740