I would like to add some meditation about the Bible still, for to explain how Ras TafarI sons and daughters can read and recommend the Bible while burning down Vatican at the same time.
For one, the scriptures are ancient and there are many copies from divers times that survived still, so apart from little mishaps transformation-wise, it is rather impossible to distort the message without anyone noticing; nuff impartial scientists/theologists are working even as I'm writing this, with solely the interest of uncovering the ancient wordsound, without promoting any set religion or doctrine.
So why we have to be careful with the scriptures? Because of canonization. This was the true Roman trick: that the time of miracles is over, go and check what God said unto Moses from the Bible, read how Jesus did this and that, but don't you go expecting any supernaturalities in this time, just come into our house and check us if you want to pay your respects to the guy upstairs.
If one believes truly in the Supreme, what reason would one have to believe that He disappeared or otherwise got bored to meddle with puny humans? What reason has man to believe that the time of the prophets is over? For one, we live; JAH is in us and all around us, He speaks thru all ages, thru _us_. So how can a man or a group of men tell us that Bible is "done"? And moreover, why are we buying it?
Other trick that the Romans pulled was to rule out some scriptures. Some are considered apocrypha (actually this word means literally "not written by the stated author" instead of the commonly used, "not part of the canon"), and appear as such in some collections of the church, but even from the official apocrypha are missing plain _crucial_ texts like Kebra Nagast (which is part of the Ethiopian Bible). Many consider Kebra Nagast to be nothing more than a fairy tale of a nation, but check who are the Ethiopian Falasha jews, and you have physical proof that these things took place. Not to mention the ark...
Some apocrypha are to confuse us: consider the books of Maccabees. Catholics regard these books as part of the apocrypha and the last books somehow belonging to the old testament legacy, but in Ethiopia there exist the books of Meqabyan, that are completely different text, although the general belief seems to hold that these are the one and the same books. In truth, the principal figures of the book of Maccabees appear in roughly one chapter of the books of Meqabyan. There is a pretty recent English translation of the Ethiopian books of Meqabyan for sale as a .pdf document, google it up if interested.
I would really love to have an English translation of the Ethiopian Bible. Does one exist, anyone?
Anyway, about the Bible and its relation to the Ethiopian Bible, do check Selassie I words about the Bible - just google up "Selassie I bible speech". There is deep-going revelation in those words - the more you start to do research about it, the more you see how H.I.M words ring true.
I apologize for the off topic meditation. Guidance and love still, especially for the moderators
