Page 1 of 4
Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:33 pm
by Rootsman
I was just wondering whether the RA people should review the current position on reggae that is recorded in the late 80`s.
I agree that the classic period for reggae was the pre-digital era and until recently have largely ignored music recorded after 1985.
But recently, I have picked up on several albums recorded 1986 & 1987 and have been really impressed.
Items such as
Coco Tea - Come Again
Frankie Paul - Hand Cart Man
Echo Minott meets Frankie Paul
Sugar Minott - Dem Ah Wolf.
I have really been impressed with these albums and it makes me beg the question. How many really good albums from 1987 / 1988 are unknown to me because they have never been listed here due to their record date.
Any thoughts on this topic or heads up on albums I should acquire that are in the vein of those I listed.
Dave
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:53 pm
by Guest
i think it would be nice but where to stop then. 1990? or already before 90?
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:55 pm
by Guest
beside dat Pad anthony had a tune i think its "my sound" aka bigger boss, natural black did voice it last year and ras shiloh too, you would have then to add them 2 sameway
to me is wikkid ting datzwhy i plan realese riddim base for only 85/95 releases.
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:49 pm
by Survival
I think it would be wicked if RA also added albums op to 1990, yes!
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:42 pm
by ras_gaks
pls, let it be done.
bless.
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:59 pm
by Guest
it a big chapter still.. it would use same volume on bytes as the old stuff
jammys alone is huge
witty
music master
music works
time one
rae
rae
ah, parish was deya big time also, if it all come up some where as a proper list it would be more dan dread but somehow that generation of people is kinda unsteady, nobody want keep records for too long some even throw tune away tun wah eva else drive big car and check women, those people used to know tune but they probably forget already everything they knew
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:33 pm
by ton1
to me, there is yet too much digital things on RA so no, in roots-archives, you have "roots"
it's up to you to begin a digital-archives on the same model
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:22 am
by Reggae Rhythm Update
Rootsman wrote:I was just wondering whether the RA people should review the current position on reggae that is recorded in the late 80`s.
YES! This site has assembled a very serious group of music fans. We can still have intelligent discussion on newer music.
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:32 am
by stepping razor
Nitty Gritty & Tenor Saw - There is quite a few LPs not listed in the RA from these artists.
peace
Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:35 am
by stepping razor
Also, Carl Meeks.
peace