Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Please post only reggae discussions here
Rootsman
Posts: 1543
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:36 pm

Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by Rootsman »

I was just wondering whether the RA people should review the current position on reggae that is recorded in the late 80`s.

I agree that the classic period for reggae was the pre-digital era and until recently have largely ignored music recorded after 1985.

But recently, I have picked up on several albums recorded 1986 & 1987 and have been really impressed.

Items such as

Coco Tea - Come Again
Frankie Paul - Hand Cart Man
Echo Minott meets Frankie Paul
Sugar Minott - Dem Ah Wolf.

I have really been impressed with these albums and it makes me beg the question. How many really good albums from 1987 / 1988 are unknown to me because they have never been listed here due to their record date.

Any thoughts on this topic or heads up on albums I should acquire that are in the vein of those I listed.

Dave
Guest

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by Guest »

i think it would be nice but where to stop then. 1990? or already before 90?
Guest

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by Guest »

beside dat Pad anthony had a tune i think its "my sound" aka bigger boss, natural black did voice it last year and ras shiloh too, you would have then to add them 2 sameway

to me is wikkid ting datzwhy i plan realese riddim base for only 85/95 releases.
Survival
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:25 am

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by Survival »

I think it would be wicked if RA also added albums op to 1990, yes! :)
Survival

Please check www.jah-lyrics.com for the largest collection of reggae lyrics!
ras_gaks
Posts: 553
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by ras_gaks »

pls, let it be done.


bless.
Guest

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by Guest »

it a big chapter still.. it would use same volume on bytes as the old stuff
jammys alone is huge
witty
music master
music works
time one
rae
rae
ah, parish was deya big time also, if it all come up some where as a proper list it would be more dan dread but somehow that generation of people is kinda unsteady, nobody want keep records for too long some even throw tune away tun wah eva else drive big car and check women, those people used to know tune but they probably forget already everything they knew
ton1
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:07 pm

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by ton1 »

to me, there is yet too much digital things on RA so no, in roots-archives, you have "roots" :)

it's up to you to begin a digital-archives on the same model :)
Antonin
Reggae Rhythm Update
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:23 am

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by Reggae Rhythm Update »

Rootsman wrote:I was just wondering whether the RA people should review the current position on reggae that is recorded in the late 80`s.
YES! This site has assembled a very serious group of music fans. We can still have intelligent discussion on newer music.
stepping razor
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by stepping razor »

Nitty Gritty & Tenor Saw - There is quite a few LPs not listed in the RA from these artists.
peace
*Reggae Record Label Artwork*
http://leggorocker.ning.com/
stepping razor
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:53 pm

Re: Should more later reggae be added to the RA listing

Post by stepping razor »

Also, Carl Meeks.
peace
*Reggae Record Label Artwork*
http://leggorocker.ning.com/
Post Reply