Sound quality - best and worse

Please post only reggae discussions here
User avatar
6anbatte
Posts: 1857
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by 6anbatte »

Hi ton1

A 20 year old recording (that has been played to death) from a poor record deck to a poor tape recorder that sounds better than something the professionals have produced? Not sure about that.

Hi Jah Titus

Absolutely no restoration work was done at all.
"Now I know the truth and must reveal it unto the youth."
mick d
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:28 am

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by mick d »

These CD re-issues have great sound quality in my opinion:

[cover=4664,4089] [cover=294,332]
Bellyman
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:08 am

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by Bellyman »

[cover=47,46]
Studio One's own release on CD is the worst you can put your hands on.
rougher yet
Chris
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:09 am

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by Chris »

Almost anything on the often discussed Abraham label could classify as worst!
Jah Titus
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 8:36 am

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by Jah Titus »

Studio One also hav a awful CD reissue of Burning Spear´s ROCKING TIME.

The Meditations´ GUIDANCE is nuff irregular.


BLESS
roots inna aapstad

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by roots inna aapstad »

ton1 wrote:Jah Titus wrote :
Some crackles (like on the Phil Pratt Thing comp') are often better than a poor remastering which makes the dynamic of the recordings disappear and sounds like a chewing-gum, looks like it was recorded in toilets while the singer is speaking in a big PVC tube floating on water (see what I mean ? ). This sound is typical of a denoise operation with a basic sound software and is really worse than doing nothing.
I totally agree with you on this.
I'd rather hear a bit of cracklin' than the horrible 'PVC tube' sound!
Of course, when done with care and the best equipment, remastering can work wonders...

Bless
Marky Dread
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:23 am

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by Marky Dread »

BEST of late: Baba Dread "Earthman Connection" - not just a killer set, it sounds great!
[cover=2592,2986]
Worst of late: Wailing Souls "Wailing Souls" (SOCD 1126) - sounds drops out, REALLY thin, no bass...
[cover=344,396]

level vibes to all!
One DREAD nation, under JAH!
greg

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by greg »

i agree with you bellyman, every studio one cd i own is poor sound quality.
gibey
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:28 pm

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by gibey »

Agree Rootsman: Jetstar ´Killer Price´ is unbelievable! Not only the speakers are collapsing, me too!
ton1
Posts: 447
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 5:07 pm

Re: Sound quality - best and worse

Post by ton1 »

Jah Titus wrote:Of course Ton1 but Phil Pratt Thing is nuff worst dan "some crackles" how yu seh.
You were right and I was wrong, I'm listening to it and there's obviously a saturation on the high frequencies. Not the worst CD I've ever heard but really disappointing for a Pressure Sound release.
Antonin
Post Reply