Is it true that songs of this LP:
[cover=1147,1318]
are the same mix/cut as on:
[cover=94,100]
You see I ask because it's a 1976-79 compilation and the other album with same song titles are recorded 80/81.
So are it different mixes/cuts or not?
Thanks alot.
Prince Alla
-
Survival
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:25 am
-
Survival
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:25 am
Re: Prince Alla
Doesn't really answer my question, but thanks all the same.Ites wrote:both are essential investments
great singer/songwriter
-
Bellyman
- Posts: 1207
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:08 am
Re: Prince Alla
The 'Best of' on Redemption sounds label was released in 1980 but the tracks on that album all were recorded from 1976 on until 1979. This 'Best of' was a collection of the original 7" and 12" mixes.
The same tracks (plus various more) were later put together on the Blood and Fire compilation.
So, YES, there is no difference in the recording or mixing.
The same tracks (plus various more) were later put together on the Blood and Fire compilation.
So, YES, there is no difference in the recording or mixing.
rougher yet
-
Survival
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:25 am
Re: Prince Alla
Thanks Bellyman, that's the answer I was looking for.Bellyman wrote:The 'Best of' on Redemption sounds label was released in 1980 but the tracks on that album all were recorded from 1976 on until 1979. This 'Best of' was a collection of the original 7" and 12" mixes.
The same tracks (plus various more) were later put together on the Blood and Fire compilation.
So, YES, there is no difference in the recording or mixing.